Jimmy Wales: verschil tussen versies

4 bytes toegevoegd ,  4 jaar geleden
geen bewerkingssamenvatting
(https://books.google.nl/books?id=E3z5bfkO4ywC&pg=PA264&lpg=PA264&dq=every+single+person+on+the+planet+is+given+free+access+to+the+sum+of+all+human+knowledge&source=bl&ots=RwlCyHc4VS&sig=OQRFKPy3c697f6EgdiM8LpL2AD0&hl=nl&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwji8NTNuIzKAhXESA8KH)
| vertaling = Stel je een wereld voor waarin elke persoon vrije toegang heeft tot alle kennis. Dat is waar wij aan werken.
| aangehaald = [http://www.wikimedia.nl/nieuwsbericht/minisymposium-wikipedia-as-a-research-tool ''Op 15 januari 2015 organiseert de KNAW een minisymposium''], Wikimedia.nl, 6 november 2014.
| opmerking = Dit citaat is onjuist/onvolledig vertaald èn door Wales herhaaldelijk genuanceerd c.q. verduidelijkt, maar wordt nog altijd regelmatig ten onrechte als hier omschreven aangehaald. De verduidelijkingen/nuanceringen zijn: "''Remember, an encyclopedia is not a data dump. The word "sum" has a purpose in that statement... an encyclopedia is not "all human knowledge" it is the "sum" of all human knowledge. It is specifically delimited for very good reasons.''" ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_38#Truth_in_advertising_.2F_the_sum_of_all_knowledge Jimbo Wales, 4 August 2008]); "''You are right that it is not the goal of Wikipedia to include all human knowledge - the key phrase usually overlooked in this criticism is "the sum". It is the goal of Wikipedia to include the sum of all human knowledge.''" ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_71#Change_.22vision.22.3F Jimbo Wales, 31 January 2011]); en "''Definitely my meaning is "summary". I wouldn't say "gist" as that word tends connote something about vagueness. But Wikipedia literally can't contain all knowledge for a number of reasons. And an encyclopedia is not, for example, a text book. And our entry on "China" for example really shouldn't be 10,000 pages long. It should provide a summary of what is known, and refer people to other sources to dig deeper. Where to stop is of course a very interesting question subject to thoughtful discussion - and of course Wikipedia can be (and is) much more comprehensive than traditional encyclopedias.''" ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_190#Please_your_meaning_of_.22the_sum_of_all_knowledge.22.3F Jimbo Wales, 3 July 2015 ]). Waar Wales het dus over een "''sum''" heeft, bedoelt hij niet "''optelling''", maar eerder een "''samenvatting van kerninformatie''". In 2007 verduidelijktehad Wales dit nog verder verduidelijkt door toe te voegen: ''The ultimate aim of Wikipedia is to create and to distribute a free encyclopedia of the highest quality to every single person on the planet in there one language.''